If the content of this message is not displayed properly, please click here
Ok - I didn't make the cut. I'm going to put that down the quality of my photographs, which on seeing the majority of the pieces featured, is the most likely reason (??)
The overall selection of work is well worth taking a look at. Although a good number of the objects are more 'standard', there are some very interesting shapes and certainly textures. The blending of techniques is often extremely interesting.
*I* certainly got some ideas from some of the work illustrated.
I will comment that the layout of the exhibit itself leaves a bit to be desired. The curator's statement is repeated in full on every one of the 122 separate pages. There are only six objects shown via thumb nail per page. It takes forever to scroll through the entire exhibit. The objects are listed alphabetically by the title. (Which does not really allow you to fast forward either - unless you knew ahead the title?)