This will be a fast overview, mainly as a photo essay, on the bloomery iron smelt carried out at Wareham on June 14, 2014.
The prototype is Culduthel, Scotland, circa 200 - 400 AD.
The furnace is a 'slag room' type, with a clay shaft built on a withy frame, over a stone base. The general details of the layout were similar to other Late Iron Age / Viking Age furnaces built in the past. The material used was a 50 / 50 mix of dry clay and course sand.
(See the earlier post :
Scottish Dark Ages Iron Smelt )
This smelt was a test / training for the 'Turf to Tools' project being undertaken at the Scottish Sculpture Workshop over August 9 - 25, 2014.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5064/b5064ed7b5493aebd3b6074be746c86847e91586" alt="" |
Clay shaft being built up on a wicker frame, over a stone base chamber. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbc92/fbc921178cd5cae716051b48e1c191473e7ada88" alt="" |
After drying fire - extensive cracking of the shaft (extraction point to right) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1515/f1515627247327f652d1526768cfd5af79bfb5ae" alt="" |
Equipment set up, at pre-heat phase. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb9a0/cb9a0f86b342223fdaee860d17df4bb2dba5dd55" alt="" |
Adding the DD-SSW1 analog |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3d1f/b3d1f0b15403a64e2edd00341c08f0ac6f069e77" alt="" |
Bloom mass at initial extraction. Bottom pull was intended, but top extraction was required. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79339/79339874b2caa4919762a5a62dcd8bc964734a15" alt="" |
After two initial compaction heats, an attempt to cut the bloom. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14bab/14bab133419f1722d19f4ad2d253da8c8155f3e4" alt="" |
Final Bloom : 5.2 kg (from 28.3 kg dry ore = 18% yield) |
The next day, the bloom was re-heated and compacted using the hydraulic press. After cutting to quarters, the interior surface was spark tested. The observation suggests roughly .6 -.7 carbon content, a good blade making material. (!)
The following will be of more interest to the archaeologicallly inclined:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15444/15444d11e6f0c1e64d9ba149a927264866ce0adf" alt="" |
The overall remains from the smelt around the furnace. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93714/93714b320afb702f0b615cc67f12ad65b9d16322" alt="" |
Broken pieces of the furnace, clearly showing the imprint of the wicker interior frame. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e97c/2e97c12393bf71ec0f31f01d5dd3c1f78d73444c" alt="" |
Furnace opened along the major cracks, showing the slag bowl in place below the tuyere entrance. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69ff8/69ff877a308a95f4633bf63e0962779b8edda268" alt="" |
Main slag bowl removed as two pieces. The tuyere was to the left. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54c49/54c49d2e202d5f79541c1fa6858c48ea8675c39d" alt="" |
Cleaned surface of the rock base. Tuyere was to the top. |
There will be a fuller report to come on making a comparison between the results here, and the remains seen in the archaeology from Culduthel.
Some General Conclusions:
- Some modifications to the layout and construction of the furnace may be necessary to :
- avoid cracking
- conform more closely to the slag pattern at Culduthel
- The analog used proved quite successful, even if the yield was a bit low.
- The general progress of the smelt followed the expected pattern.
- A better system needs to be established for re-heating the bloom for consollodation.
With thanks to the working team:
Kelly, Ron, Heather, Rodger, Neil, Richard.
No comments:
Post a Comment